Trending in Telehealth: January 29 – February 5, 2024

By and on February 9, 2024
Posted In Telehealth

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Interstate compacts
  • Medicaid coverage
  • Private payor coverage

A CLOSER LOOK

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase
Highlights:

  • In Michigan, HB 4579 and HB 4580 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bills would require coverage parity of telehealth services in health plans and Medicaid, respectively.
  • In New Hampshire, SB 318 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would enter New Hampshire into the Social Work Licensure Compact.
  • In South Carolina, H 4159 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bill would create a new “South Carolina Telehealth and Telemedicine Modernization Act,” which would regulate all licensees providing services via telehealth. The bill would also revise the Medical Practice Act statutes related to telehealth, including addressing ongoing care provided by an out-of-state physician not licensed in telehealth, as well as implementing standards for licensees solely providing services via telehealth (including evaluation, recordkeeping, follow-up care and prescribing standards).
  • In South Dakota, HB 1012 and HB 1015 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bills would enter South Dakota into the Counseling Compact and Social Work Licensure Compact, respectively.
  • In Tennessee, SB 1862 and HB 1863 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bills would enter Tennessee into the Dietitian Licensure Compact.
  • In Tennessee, HB 2461 and SB 1674 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bills would allow for Tennessee’s Medicaid program to reimburse qualifying remote ultrasound procedures and remote fetal nonstress tests when the patient is in a residence or other off-site location that is separate from the patient’s provider and the same standard of care is met.
  • In Utah, HB 44 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bill would enter Utah into the Social Work Licensure Compact.
  • In Utah, SB 24 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would amend the statute providing for Medicaid reimbursement for telepsychiatric consultations to require coverage for telepsychiatric consultations conducted by physician assistants.
  • In Virginia, SB 2500 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would require the Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services to modify the state plan for medical assistance to include a provision allowing for reimbursement for remote ultrasound procedures and remote fetal nonstress tests under certain conditions.

Why it matters:

  • There continues to be an increase in activity surrounding licensure compacts. This includes established compacts, such as the Counseling Compact and Social Work Licensure Compact, as well as the Dietician Licensure Compact, which recently finalized its model legislation and has not yet been enacted in any states. In general, these state efforts ease the burdens of the licensing process and demonstrate a desire to facilitate multijurisdictional practice without giving up authority over professional licensure.
  • States continue to pass rules to regulate coverage of telehealth services, including for private health plans and state Medicaid programs. As the use of telehealth services has risen, states have regulated how payors, including private plans and Medicaid programs, cover telehealth services. This regulation may include broad coverage parity (requiring coverage for services furnished via telehealth if such services would be covered if furnished in-person) and payment parity (reimbursing services via telehealth at the same rate such services would have been covered if furnished in person) mandates; or, for state Medicaid programs, may more specifically address particular telehealth services that must be covered and which practitioner can be reimbursed for such services.

Telehealth is an important development in care delivery, but the regulatory patchwork is complicated. The McDermott digital health team works alongside the industry’s leading providers, payors and technology innovators to help them enter new markets, break down barriers to delivering accessible care and mitigate enforcement risk through proactive compliance. Are you working to make healthcare more accessible through telehealth? Let us help you transform telehealth.

Lisa Mazur
Lisa Mazur advises health care providers and technology companies on a variety of legal, regulatory and compliance matters with a particular focus on digital health topics, including telehealth, telemedicine, mobile health and consumer wellness. Lisa advises a variety of health care providers and technology companies involved in “digital health,” including assisting clients in developing and implementing telemedicine programs by advising on issues related to professional licensure, scope of practice, informed consent, prescribing and reimbursement. Lisa helps clients identify and understand the relevant legal issues, and develop and implement practical, forward-thinking solutions and strategies that meet the complex and still-evolving digital health regulatory landscape.Read Lisa's full bio here.


Grayson Dimick
Grayson I. Dimick focuses her practice on regulatory and transactional matters affecting a wide range of clients across the health care industry. Grayson advises clients on a variety of issues, including the regulatory and compliance aspects of digital health. She also conducts due diligence on health care transactions.

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

2021 Chambers USA top ranked firm
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law