Telehealth
Subscribe to Telehealth's Posts

Trending in Telehealth: March 19 – March 25, 2024

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Behavioral Health
  • Licensure Compacts
  • Telehealth Practice Requirements

A CLOSER LOOK

Finalized Legislation and Rulemaking:

  • Florida enacted SB 7016, which, among other things, enters Florida into the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, the Physical Therapy Compact, and the Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Compact.
  • In Utah, HB 365 was enacted. This act allows physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants to conduct initial consults for certain cosmetic procedures via telemedicine, including cryolipolysis (i.e. the removal of fat deposits using cold temperatures) and certain cosmetic laser treatments. Telemedicine consults would not be permitted for hair removal or tattoo removal treatments.
  • Washington enacted HB 1939 to enter the Social Work Licensure Compact.
  • In Washington, SB 5481 was also enacted. This act establishes professional practice standards for healthcare practitioners that provide telehealth services and establishes requirements for out-of-state health care practitioners.
  • Washington also passed SB 5821, which amends existing standards for establishing a provider-patient relationship related to audio-only coverage requirements. The act defines an established relationship to include a provider of audio-only telemedicine who has, among other things, seen the patient in-person or through real-time interactive audio and video technology at least once in the last three years or an audio-only provider to whom the patient was referred by a physician who had seen the patient, in-person or through real-time interactive audio and video technology, at least once in the past three years.
  • Wisconsin enacted SB 476, which prohibits the Wisconsin Medicaid program from requiring that telehealth providers have a physical address in the state.

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase:

Highlights:

  • In Alaska, SB 91 passed the first chamber. The bill would permit an out-of-state member of a physician’s multidisciplinary care team to provide services in Alaska via telehealth if the service provided by the out-of-state member is not reasonably available in the state or it involves ongoing treatment or follow-up care regarding a suspected or diagnosed life-threatening condition. The bill would also establish grounds for disciplinary action against an out-of-state member of a physician’s multidisciplinary care team.
  • In Georgia, HB 441 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bill would, among other things, require a dentist intending to provide care via teledentristry to notify the Georgia Board of Dentistry and to provide documentation that the dentist has established a referral relationship with a dentist capable of providing in-person dental care at a location within the state meeting certain geographic requirements. A dentist providing teledentistry would be permitted to authorize dental hygienists to perform certain dental hygiene functions, prescribe noncontrolled prescriptions and authorize the performance of digital scans and the transmission of patient records to the dentist. The proposed bill would require dentists to perform an initial in-person examination and an in-person exam at least once [...]

    Continue Reading



read more

Trending in Telehealth: March 12 – March 18, 2024

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Expanding Telehealth
  • Telehealth Practice Requirements

A CLOSER LOOK

Finalized Legislation and Rulemaking:

  • Indiana enacted SB 132, which removes the requirement that out-of-state providers licensed in Indiana and their employer/contractor file a certification to be subject to Indiana jurisdiction and laws with the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency before providing telehealth services in Indiana. Providers would still be subject to Indiana jurisdiction and substantive and procedural law.
  • In Indiana, SB 104 was also enacted, which requires veterinarians and veterinary technicians to disclose certain information when renewing a license or registration certificate including whether services are provided via telehealth.
  • New Hampshire adopted a final rule, which includes amendments to describe the initial application process, qualifications, renewals and audits for psychologists. It also clarifies requirements for a tele-pass license for psychologists.
  • Utah enacted HB 44, which enters Utah into the Social Work Licensure Compact.
  • Utah enacted HB 145, which permits veterinarians to supervise veterinary technicians via telehealth. Previously, veterinarians were only permitted to supervise state-certified veterinarian technicians via telehealth.

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase:

Highlights:

  • In Maryland, HB 1078 passed the first chamber. The bill would require the state Medicaid program to provide ultrasound procedures and remote fetal nonstress tests in certain circumstances.
  • In Wisconsin, SB 823 passed the first chamber. This bill would require out-of-state practitioners to register with the Department of Safety and Professional Services or an applicable Wisconsin credentialing board to provide telehealth services in Wisconsin.
  • In Kentucky, HB 829 passed the first chamber. This bill, among other things, would require a patient or designated caregiver to complete a consultation with an authorized pharmacist prior to purchasing medical cannabis and would require the patient to complete the consultation annually. The bill includes an exception to the consultation requirement for visiting qualified patients presenting a valid out-of-state registry identification card and proof of diagnosis of a qualifying condition. It provides that the consultation may be completed via telehealth and establishes a process for pharmacists to become authorized to provide medical cannabis consultations.
  • In Michigan, a proposed rule would require chiropractors to obtain consent from patients before providing telehealth services, maintain proof of consent in patient’s medical record and require chiropractors to exercise the same standard of care applicable to in-person service when providing service via telehealth.
  • In Nevada, a proposed rule would establish provisions related to teledentistry, including requiring dentists to collect a digital form of written consent for a patient, specify recording keeping requirements for teledentistry and establish standards for collaborations with other providers.
  • In Texas, a proposed rule would permit physical therapists providing services to students with disabilities in the educational setting to perform certain examinations via telehealth by removing the onsite examination requirement.
  • In [...]

    Continue Reading



read more

Trending in Telehealth: March 5 – March 11, 2024

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Interstate compacts
  • Expanding Telehealth

A CLOSER LOOK

Finalized Legislation and Rulemaking:

  • In South Carolina, the governor signed H 4159, the South Carolina Telehealth and Telemedicine Modernization Act, which establishes uniform baseline standards for all professionals licensed by a licensing board in the state providing services via telehealth. The act also revises the provisions of the Medical Practice Act related to telehealth, including addressing ongoing telehealth treatment provided by an out-of-state physician not licensed in South Carolina, as well as implementing standards for licensees solely providing services via telehealth (including evaluation, recordkeeping, follow-up care and prescribing standards).

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase:

Highlights:

  • In Arizona, SB 1267 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would permit physical therapists to supervise physical therapy assistants through certain telehealth modalities.
  • In Colorado, HB 24-1048 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bill would specify that an in-person, physical examination of an animal is required to establish a veterinarian-client-patient relationship and would extend that relationship to other licensed veterinarians who share the same physical premises if those other veterinarians have access to and have reviewed the patient’s records. It would also permit veterinarians, with consent of the client, to provide veterinary services—including prescribing medication—via telemedicine to clients and patients located in Colorado with an established veterinarian-client-patient relationship. The bill establishes recording-keeping, confidentiality, and privacy requirements related to the use of telehealth and empowers the Colorado State Board of Veterinary Medicine to issue rules further regulating the use of telehealth. It also permits a license veterinarian to utilize tele-supervision of veterinary personnel if certain conditions are met.
  • In Hawaii, HB 2079 passed the first chamber. If enacted, this bill would, among other things, allow a practitioner who is licensed in Hawaii to prescribe schedule III and IV controlled substances, including testosterone, for the purpose of providing gender-affirming care while the practitioner is located outside the State and without conducting an in-person consultation with the patient, provided that the practitioner prescribes the controlled substances via a synchronous audio-visual telehealth interaction.
  • In Idaho, HB 684 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would permit telebehavioral health services to be provided on public school premises.
  • In Kentucky, SB 111 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would require health benefit plans, limited health service benefit plans, Medicaid, and state health plans to provide coverage for speech therapy provided via telehealth.
  • In Kentucky, SB 255 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would establish requirements and standards for providing social work services via telehealth.
  • In Mississippi, HB 177 and SB 2157 both passed the first chamber. If enacted, these bills would enter Mississippi into the Dietician Licensure Compact and the Psychology Interjurisdictional [...]

    Continue Reading



read more

Corporate Transparency Act: Key Considerations for Virtual Care Providers

As of January 1, 2024, the US Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) requires corporations, limited liability companies, limited partnerships and other similar entities to disclose beneficial ownership information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau within the US Department of the Treasury. Although the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama declared the CTA unconstitutional in March 2024, the decision in the underlying case is limited to the plaintiff. Therefore, all other entities – including virtual care providers – are still required to comply with the CTA.

Following are key considerations for virtual care providers utilizing friendly PC structures.

  1. Are professional entities (i.e., PCs, PLLCs, PAs) subject to CTA reporting requirements? Yes. The CTA includes certain exemptions, but these are unlikely to apply to a professional entity formed to provide virtual care services.
  2. To whom do CTA reporting requirements apply? The reporting obligation is on the reporting company (i.e., the entity formed by a filing in a US state) – not on the beneficial owners or the person or entity assisting with the formation of the reporting company (i.e., the company applicant, defined as the individual who directly files the document that forms the reporting company and the individual who is primarily responsible for directing or controlling such filing if more than one individual is involved in the filing, with no more than two company applicants). However, individuals and entities other than the reporting company can be held liable for willful violations of the CTA (e.g., an individual who willfully fails to report complete beneficial ownership information or an individual who files – or causes the filer to file – false information with FinCEN).
  3. What reporting is required? The reporting company must visit FinCEN’s Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) website to complete and file a beneficial ownership information report (BOIR). Reporting companies formed before January 1, 2024, have until January 1, 2025, to file a BOIR; those formed during 2024 must file a BOIR within 90 calendar days of the effective date of formation; and those formed on or after January 1, 2025, will have 30 calendar days to file a BOIR.
  4. Who are beneficial owners? Are friendly physician owners beneficial owners? Reporting companies must identify each of their beneficial owners, defined as any individual who, directly or indirectly, exercises substantial control over the reporting company or who owns or controls at least 25% of the ownership interests in a reporting company. Individuals with substantial control include senior officers (e.g., president, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer and general counsel), as well as anyone who can make important decisions on behalf of the reporting company, including the power to appoint and remove senior officers or a majority of the board of directors (or similar governing body). Accordingly, friendly physician owners are likely to be beneficial owners.
  5. What information must be reported in a BOIR? Reporting companies must provide the following information:



read more

Trending in Telehealth: February 27 – March 4, 2024

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Interstate compacts
  • Expanding telehealth
  • Regulation of teledentistry

A CLOSER LOOK

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase:

Highlights:

  • In Arizona, HB 2446 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would establish licensing requirements for dietician nutritionists and nutritionists, which would allow for the delivery of dietetic and nutrition services via telehealth.
  • In Florida, HB 849 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bill would establish requirements for the delivery of veterinary telehealth services by Florida-licensed veterinarians.
  • In Florida, HB 855 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bill would, among other changes, require dental practice to designate a dentist of record with the Florida Board of Dentistry. It would also require dentists to perform an in-person examination of a patient or to obtain records of an in-person evaluation before initiating orthodontic treatment. The proposal would also require that dentists placing advertisements of dental services provided through telehealth include a disclaimer recommending an in-person examination for each of the following services: an impression or digital dental scan, denture services, placement of an appliance or other structure, and orthodontic treatment. Under the proposal, failure to comply with the evaluation requirement and failure to provide patients with contact information of each dentist who is providing dental services to a patient would be grounds for discipline.
  • In Georgia, HB 844 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would establish licensing requirements for dietician nutritionists and nutritionists, which would allow for the delivery of dietetic and nutrition services via telehealth.
  • In Georgia, HB 441 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would, among other requirements, require a dentist intending to provide care via teledentristry to notify the Georgia Board of Dentistry and to provide documentation that the dentist had established a referral relationship with a dentist capable of providing in-person dental care at a location within the state meeting certain geographic requirements. A dentist providing teledentistry would be permitted to authorize dental hygienists to perform certain dental hygiene functions, prescribe noncontrolled prescriptions and authorize the performance of digital scans and the transmission of patient records to the dentist. The proposed bill would require dentists to perform an initial in-person examination and an in-person exam at least once every 12 months to provide teledentistry services to a patient, except for patients seen in certain specified settings. It would also require dentists to obtain written authorization to a patient with information about the treating dentist and dental hygienist and obtain informed consent after providing a written statement advising the patient that teledentistry was not equivalent to an in-person clinical exam and that the dentist would not physically be present. The bill would prohibit an insurer from excluding coverage for a service [...]

    Continue Reading



read more

Trending in Telehealth: February 12 – February 26, 2024

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Interstate compacts
  • Professional standards

A CLOSER LOOK

Finalized Legislation & Rulemaking

  • South Dakota enacted the Counseling Compact, making it the 33rd state to ratify the compact.
  • South Dakota also adopted HB 1029, which specifies that licensed hearing aid dispensers and audiologists can deliver services via telehealth provided they are of the same quality as services delivered face-to-face.
  • In Texas, the Commission of Licensing and Regulation adopted rules that reorganize and revise telehealth standards for behavioral analysts. The changes include better aligning the telehealth practice standards with those for other professions regulated by the Department of Licensing and Regulation. Similarly, the Commission of Licensing and Regulation adopted a rule addressing supervision for behavioral analysts, which includes provisions addressing supervision via telehealth.

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase

Highlights:

  • In Arizona, SB 1036 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would enact the Social Work Licensure Compact.
  • In Florida, SB 7016 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bill would enter Florida into the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact.
  • In Louisiana, the Behavior Analyst Board proposed rules governing behavioral analyst practice, including establishing telehealth practice standards.
  • In Oklahoma, the Board of Examiners in Optometry proposed rule 505:10-5-19 that would address telemedicine practice by optometrists and, among other things, prohibit an optometrist from prescribing contact lenses or spectacles via a telemedicine encounter. The rule would also establish requirements for informed consent and practice requirements associated with a telemedicine visit.
  • In Tennessee, SB 2134 and HB 2405 each passed one chamber. If enacted, the bills would enact the Social Work Licensure Compact.
  • In Utah, SB 24 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bill would require Medicaid reimbursement for telepsychiatric consultations between a physician assistant and a psychiatrist. The law currently requires reimbursement only for telepsychiatric consultations between a physician and a psychiatrist.
  • In Virginia, HB 326 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would enter Virginia into the Counseling Compact.
  • In West Virginia, HB 4110 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would authorize the state’s Board of Licensed Dietitians to promulgate a legislative rule relating to telehealth practice, requirements and definitions.
  • In Wisconsin, SB 158 passed both chambers and awaits the governor’s signature. If enacted, the bill would enact the Social Work Licensure Compact.

Why it matters:

  • States continue to increase activity surrounding licensure compacts for a variety of health professionals. These state efforts ease the burdens of the licensing process and demonstrate a desire to facilitate multijurisdictional practice without giving up [...]

    Continue Reading



read more

Trending in Telehealth: February 5 – 12, 2024

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Interstate compacts
  • Facilitation of connectivity and data exchange
  • Professional standards

A CLOSER LOOK

Finalized Legislation & Rulemaking

  • South Dakota enacted the Social Work Licensure Compact, becoming the second state to enact the compact. Missouri enacted the compact in July 2023. The compact will become active once enacted by seven states. According to the National Center for Interstate Compacts, 24 other states have introduced the compact.

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase

Highlights:

  • In Idaho, HB 393 passed the first chamber. If enacted, it would enter Idaho into the Counseling Compact.
  • In Indiana, SB 132 passed the first chamber. Currently, Indiana law provides that an out-of-state provider licensed in Indiana may not provide telehealth services in Indiana until the provider and their employer/contractor have filed a certification with the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency that the provider and employer/contractor agree to be subject to Indiana jurisdiction and Indiana substantive and procedural laws. If enacted, the bill would remove the requirement to file the certification, though providers would still be subject to Indiana jurisdiction and Indiana substantive and procedural laws, and the provision of health services (rather than the filing of the certification) would constitute a voluntary waiver of other jurisdictional rights.
  • In West Virginia, HB 5310 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would enact the Remote Patient Outcome Improvement Act to authorize insurers and providers to partner with internet service providers to facilitate the transmission and analysis of vital signs and medical device data.
  • In Wisconsin, the Marriage and Family Therapy, Professional Counseling and Social Worker Examining Board proposed a rule that would update telehealth practice standards by defining telehealth, creating of a new subsection that establishes standards of telehealth practice, amending the definitions of “face-to-face” and “supervision” to include telehealth practice, and amending of unprofessional conduct provisions to incorporate telehealth practice.

Why it matters:

  • States continue to increase activity surrounding licensure compacts for a variety of health professionals. These state efforts ease the burdens of the licensing process and demonstrate a desire to facilitate multijurisdictional practice without giving up authority over professional licensure.
  • Measures emphasizing connectivity and infrastructure complement the increasing availability of reimbursement for remote monitoring and other virtual care modalities. States propose measures such as West Virginia’s Remote Patient Outcome Improvement Act with the expectation that they will help reduce costs of avoidable emergency room and other medical visits when paired with remote monitoring programs.
  • States continue to amend and clarify professional practice standards for telehealth. With the increase in the delivery of care through virtual modalities, professional boards are adopting standards governing telehealth practice across multiple health professions and revising [...]

    Continue Reading



read more

Trending in Telehealth: January 29 – February 5, 2024

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Interstate compacts
  • Medicaid coverage
  • Private payor coverage

A CLOSER LOOK

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase
Highlights:

  • In Michigan, HB 4579 and HB 4580 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bills would require coverage parity of telehealth services in health plans and Medicaid, respectively.
  • In New Hampshire, SB 318 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would enter New Hampshire into the Social Work Licensure Compact.
  • In South Carolina, H 4159 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bill would create a new “South Carolina Telehealth and Telemedicine Modernization Act,” which would regulate all licensees providing services via telehealth. The bill would also revise the Medical Practice Act statutes related to telehealth, including addressing ongoing care provided by an out-of-state physician not licensed in telehealth, as well as implementing standards for licensees solely providing services via telehealth (including evaluation, recordkeeping, follow-up care and prescribing standards).
  • In South Dakota, HB 1012 and HB 1015 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bills would enter South Dakota into the Counseling Compact and Social Work Licensure Compact, respectively.
  • In Tennessee, SB 1862 and HB 1863 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bills would enter Tennessee into the Dietitian Licensure Compact.
  • In Tennessee, HB 2461 and SB 1674 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bills would allow for Tennessee’s Medicaid program to reimburse qualifying remote ultrasound procedures and remote fetal nonstress tests when the patient is in a residence or other off-site location that is separate from the patient’s provider and the same standard of care is met.
  • In Utah, HB 44 passed both chambers. If enacted, the bill would enter Utah into the Social Work Licensure Compact.
  • In Utah, SB 24 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would amend the statute providing for Medicaid reimbursement for telepsychiatric consultations to require coverage for telepsychiatric consultations conducted by physician assistants.
  • In Virginia, SB 2500 passed the first chamber. If enacted, the bill would require the Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services to modify the state plan for medical assistance to include a provision allowing for reimbursement for remote ultrasound procedures and remote fetal nonstress tests under certain conditions.

Why it matters:

  • There continues to be an increase in activity surrounding licensure compacts. This includes established compacts, such as the Counseling Compact and Social Work Licensure Compact, as well as the Dietician Licensure Compact, which recently finalized its model legislation and has not yet been enacted in any states. In general, these state efforts ease the burdens of the licensing [...]

    Continue Reading



read more

Trending in Telehealth: January 22 – 29, 2024

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Interstate compacts
  • Scope of practice
  • Medicaid reimbursement

A CLOSER LOOK

Finalized Legislation & Rulemaking

  • Arkansas passed final rule, which provides Medicaid coverage for ambulance telemedicine triage services. Specifically, an ambulance service may triage and transport a beneficiary to an alternative destination or treat in place if the ambulance service is coordinating the care of the beneficiary through telemedicine with a physician for a medical-based complaint or with a behavioral health specialist for a behavioral-based complaint.

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase

Highlights:

  • Florida proposed a rule to clarify the Board of Psychology’s supervised experience requirements in light of recent statutory changes involving telehealth.
  • Iowa proposed rules to clarify the scope of practice including recordkeeping, ethical practice standards, and use of telehealth visits for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants and physical therapists and physical therapist assistants.
  • Nevada proposed a rule to define a social workers’ scope of practice and licensure requirements and clarify when services may be provided through telehealth to a client outside the State of Nevada, among other things.
  • South Carolina progressed H 4159 in the second chamber to enact the South Carolina Telehealth and Telemedicine Modernization Act. The bill defines necessary terms and provides requirements for certain regulated healthcare professionals who provide healthcare by means of telehealth; amends definitions in the medical practice act to define “telehealth”; and amends law relating to the practice of telemedicine to revise requirements for the practice of telemedicine and to include provisions concerning telehealth.
  • South Dakota progressed HB 1015 in the second chamber to adopt the social work licensure compact.
  • Utah progressed SB 24 in the first chamber. The bill clarifies the scope of practice of physician assistants to include telepsychiatry services.

Why it matters:

  • States continue to progress laws clarifying the use of telehealth within a practitioners’ scope of practice. This week, Florida, Iowa, Nevada and Utah proposed rules or progressed legislation clarifying that several healthcare practitioners’ scope of practice include the use of telehealth.

Telehealth is an important development in care delivery, but the regulatory patchwork is complicated. The McDermott digital health team works alongside the industry’s leading providers, payors and technology innovators to help them enter new markets, break down barriers to delivering accessible care and mitigate enforcement risk through proactive compliance. Are you working to make healthcare more accessible through telehealth? Let us help you transform telehealth.




read more

Trending in Telehealth: January 16 – 22, 2024

Trending in Telehealth highlights state legislative and regulatory developments that impact the healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists and technology companies that deliver and facilitate the delivery of virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Interstate compacts
  • Behavioral health
  • Expanding telehealth

A CLOSER LOOK

Legislation & Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase

Highlights:

  • Florida progressed SB 7016, which expands the telehealth minority maternity care pilot program to a statewide program; enacts the interstate medical licensure compact; and enacts the audiology and speech-language pathology interstate compact.
  • Oklahoma proposed a rule to include the use of telemedicine within the optometrist’s scope of practice under certain circumstances and clarify medication dispensation and storage requirements.
  • South Dakota progressed HB 1015 to adopt the social work licensure compact.
  • Texas proposed rule to expand the existing Department of Health’s Emergency Medical Care rules by providing telemedicine options in non-rural counties and expanding the use of telemedicine in rural counties, by integrating the use of telemedicine by Advanced Practice Provider (APP) in Rural Level IV trauma facilities under certain circumstances.
  • Utah progressed HB 44 to adopt the social work licensure compact.
  • Wisconsin proposed a rule to amend current standards of practice for supervising physical therapist assistants to incorporate new telehealth practices. Specifically, the current supervision rules require supervision physical therapists to provide on-site assessment and reevaluation of each patient at least once each calendar month or every 10th treatment day, whichever is sooner, while new telehealth practices permit patients to receive treatments using telehealth. The new rule will resolve the conflict between the on-site assessment and reevaluation requirements for supervision and patients’ ability to schedule telehealth visits.
  • Wisconsin progressed AB 573 and AB 541to the second chamber. AB 573 directs the Department of Health Services to establish a pilot program to implement virtual behavioral health crisis care services for use by county or municipal law enforcement agencies in the field to connect law enforcement officers who encounter persons in crisis to behavioral healthcare services. AB 541 provides that no mental health care provider may be required to be licensed, registered, certified, or otherwise approved to practice in the state to provide mental health services by telehealth to patients located in the state unless mental health care provider satisfies certain conditions.

Why it matters:

  • There continues to be elevated activity surrounding licensure compacts. This week, Florida, South Dakota and Utah progressed laws to adopt interstate licensure compacts.
  • States continue to progress laws to incorporate the use of telehealth in practitioners’ scope of practice. This week, several states progressed legislation expanding practitioners’ scope of practice to include telehealth services under certain circumstances.

Telehealth is an important development in care delivery, but the regulatory patchwork is complicated. The McDermott digital health team works alongside the industry’s leading providers, payors and technology innovators to help them enter new markets, break [...]

Continue Reading




read more

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

2021 Chambers USA top ranked firm
LEgal 500 EMEA top tier firm 2021
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law