Telehealth Flexibilities
Subscribe to Telehealth Flexibilities's Posts

2024: The Year of the Telehealth Cliff

What does December 31, 2024, mean to you? New Year’s Eve? Post-2024 election? Too far away to know?

Our answer: December 31, 2024, is when we will go over a “telehealth cliff” if Congress fails to act before that date, directly impacting care and access for Medicare beneficiaries. What is this telehealth cliff? Let’s back up a bit.

TELEHEALTH COVERAGE POLICIES

Current statute (1834(m) of the Social Security Act) lays out payment and coverage policies for Medicare telehealth services. As written, the provisions significantly limit Medicare providers’—and therefore patients’—ability to utilize telehealth services. Some examples:

  • If the patient is in their home when the telehealth service is being provided, telehealth is generally not eligible for reimbursement.
  • Providers cannot bill for telehealth services provided via audio-only communication.
  • There is a narrow list of providers who are eligible to seek reimbursement for telehealth services.

COVID-19-RELATED TELEHEALTH FLEXIBILITIES

When the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, a public health emergency (PHE) was declared. Congress passed several laws, and the administration acted through its own authorities to provide flexibilities around these Medicare telehealth restrictions. In general, nearly all statutory limitations on telehealth were lifted during the PHE. As we all know, utilization of telehealth skyrocketed.

The PHE ended last year, and through subsequent congressional efforts and regulatory actions by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), many flexibilities were extended beyond the end of the PHE, through December 31, 2024. Congress and CMS continue to grapple with how to support the provision of Medicare telehealth services for the future.

CMS has taken steps through the annual payment rule, the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS), to align many of the payment and coverage policies for which it has regulatory authority with congressional deadlines. CMS has also restructured its telehealth list, giving more clarity to stakeholders and Congress as to which pandemic-era telehealth services could continue if an extension is passed. But CMS can’t address the statutory limitations on its own. Congress must legislate. CMS highlighted this in the final calendar year (CY) 2024 MPFS rule released on November 2, 2023, noting that “while the CAA, 2023, does extend certain COVID-19 PHE flexibilities, including allowing the beneficiary’s home to serve as an originating site, such flexibilities are only extended through the end of CY 2024.”

THE TELEHEALTH CLIFF

This brings us to the telehealth cliff. CMS generally releases the annual MPFS proposed rule in July, with the final rule coming on or around November 1. If history is any indication, Congress is not likely to act on the extensions much before the current December 31 deadline. This sets up the potential for a high level of uncertainty headed into 2025.

If we go over, this telehealth cliff would directly impact care and access for Medicare beneficiaries. The effects could be felt acutely in rural and underserved areas, where patients have been able to access, via telehealth, medical services that may have been out of reach for them in the past. The telehealth cliff would [...]

Continue Reading




read more

Trending in Telehealth: May 23 – 30, 2023

Trending in Telehealth is a series from the McDermott digital health team in which we highlight state legislative and regulatory developments that impact healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists, and technology companies that deliver and facilitate virtual care.
Trending in the past week:

  • Forensic Examinations
  • Telehealth Flexibilities

A CLOSER LOOK
Finalized Legislation and Rulemaking

  • Florida passed legislation (SB 218) amending Fla. Stat. Ann. § 456.47 to revise the definition of “telehealth provider” to include persons licensed as genetic counselors. By way of background, in 2021, the Florida legislature created a new licensed and regulated profession—genetic counseling. SB 218 is likely one of several pieces of legislation that will incorporate the newly created profession into existing regulatory frameworks.
  • Minnesota enacted legislation (SF 2744) allowing telehealth to factor into the network adequacy assessments required to be performed by health carriers under Minnesota’s insurance laws. Minnesota also enacted appropriations legislation (SF 2995) that, among other things, allocates money for a study of telehealth expansion and payment parity in 2024.
  • Nevada passed legislation (AB 276) amending Nev. Rev. Stat. § 629.515 to authorize a provider who is conducting certain forensic medical examinations on an apparent victim of sexual assault or strangulation to use telehealth to connect to an appropriately trained physician, physician assistant or registered nurse to obtain instructions and guidance on conducting the examination.
  • West Virginia’s legislation requiring hospitals to have a trained healthcare provider available, or transfer agreement as provided in a county plan, to complete a sexual assault forensic examination (SB 89) became effective May 21, 2023, 90 days after its passage. “Available” includes having access to a trained sexual assault forensic examination expert via telehealth.

Legislation and Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase
Highlights:

  • Illinois progressed legislation (SB 2123) in the second chamber that would adopt the Counseling Compact.
  • Texas continued to progress legislation (HB 1771) in the second chamber that would require that each agency with regulatory authority over a health professional providing a telemedicine medical service, teledentistry or telehealth to adopt rules necessary to standardize formats for and retention of records related to a patient’s consent to treatment, data collection and data sharing.
  • Texas also progressed legislation (HB 617) in the second chamber that would establish a pilot project to provide emergency medical services instruction and emergency prehospital care instruction through a telemedicine medical service or telehealth service provided by regional trauma resource centers to healthcare providers in rural trauma facilities and emergency medical services providers in rural areas.

Why it matters:

  • Telehealth capabilities can reduce disparities in forensic examinations. States continue to progress legislation aiming to decrease disparities in the quality of forensic examinations by providing expert, live, interactive quality control and evidence-based methodologies to less experienced providers. Proponents argue that partnering on-site staff with telehealth [...]

    Continue Reading



read more

Trending in Telehealth: May 16 – 22, 2023

Trending in Telehealth is a series from the McDermott digital health team in which we highlight state legislative and regulatory developments that impact healthcare providers, telehealth and digital health companies, pharmacists, and technology companies that deliver and facilitate virtual care.

Trending in the past week:

  • Interstate Compacts
  • Telehealth Flexibilities

A CLOSER LOOK

Finalized Legislation & Rulemaking

  • The North Carolina General Assembly voted to override Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto of SB 20. Dubbed the Care for Women, Children, and Families Act, SB 20 operates to reduce access to reproductive health services, including by eliminating the provider’s ability to give patients information contained in the relevant consent form over the telephone. The legislation takes effect July 1.

Legislation and Rulemaking Activity in Proposal Phase

Highlights:

  • Alaska progressed legislation (SB 75) in the first chamber to join the Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Interstate Compact.
  • Illinois progressed legislation (SB 2123) in the first chamber to adopt the Counseling Compact.
  • Oregon progressed legislation (SB 232) that would update the Oregon Medical Board’s telemedicine regulations at 52 O.R.S. §§ 677.080 and 677.137 to clarify that the practice of medicine occurs where a patient is physically located.
  • Texas continued to progress legislation (HB 1771) that would require each agency with regulatory authority over a health professional providing a telemedicine, teledentistry or telehealth to adopt rules to standardize formats for and retention of records related to a patient’s consent to treatment, data collection and data sharing.
  • Texas also progressed legislation (HB 617) in the first chamber that would establish a pilot project to provide emergency medical and prehospital care instruction through telemedicine/telehealth services by regional trauma resource centers to healthcare providers in rural area trauma facilities.

Why it matters:

  • Interstate compact adoption remains elevated. States continue to progress legislation that would enact licensure compacts across healthcare professions. This week, Alaska and Illinois took steps to adopt compacts that would ease out-of-state licensure hurdles and improve shared systems across public agencies.
  • Texas addresses rural care via telehealth. Many states are progressing legislation that would permanently extend telehealth flexibilities to allow providers to practice across counties and use technologies to reach and educate patients in rural low-access areas.

Telehealth is an important development in care delivery, but the regulatory patchwork is complicated. The McDermott digital health team works alongside the industry’s leading providers, payors and technology innovators to help them enter new markets, break down barriers to delivering accessible care and mitigate enforcement risk through proactive compliance. Are you working to make healthcare more accessible through telehealth? Let us help you transform telehealth.




read more

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

2021 Chambers USA top ranked firm
LEgal 500 EMEA top tier firm 2021
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law